星际迷航2
“保”驾护航，“救”在身边——保育员急救技能评比_我的网站
一 | “保”驾护航 “救”在身边 ——保育员急救技能评比 昆山市花桥中心幼儿园 为了进一步提高保育员面对突发事件的急救能力和应急意识，加强保育员对幼儿护理的准确性，确保幼儿的健康和生活环境的安全。
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post.
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge.
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said.
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine.
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation.
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。12月6日下午，我园开展了“‘保’驾护航，‘救’在身边”保育员急救技能评比。 赛前重培训 在评比之前，我们开展了急救技能知识专题培训，通过PPT讲解、示范操作等方式介绍了气管异物梗阻、鼻出血等发事件应急处理的方法，加强了保育员对幼儿急救技能的了解和掌握。 实操显身手 比赛开始前，主持人宣读了比赛流程及比赛注意事项，由徐园长、胡主任、保健医生担任此次比赛的评委，希望每一位保育员积极参与、认真对待！ 海姆立克急救法 “海姆立克急救法”是保育员们必须掌握的一项急救技能。
二 | 当异物不慎被孩子吸入呼吸道，停留在呼吸道让孩子不能呼吸，这时候如果不能及时处理排除异物，在短时间内就可能造成幼儿窒息死亡。
三 | 熟练掌握“海姆立克急救法”这就十分重要，同时这种急救法是我们每个教职工必须掌握的技能。 心肺复苏急救法 当你遇到昏迷不醒的人怎么办？对，就采用心肺复苏急救法。这不仅是幼儿园老师必须掌握的急救技能，在社会中遇见了这种情况也同样重要。 诺如病毒感染呕吐包消毒处置流程 诺如病毒感染易引起儿童患者呕吐，呕吐物中含大量病毒颗粒，极易造成传播。如何处理呕吐物并做好消毒工作，避免病毒传播，对我们十分重要。
四 | 这次的保育员急救技能评比，不仅仅是一次比赛的过程，也是一个相互观摩、切磋与实践的过程。在互相观摩学习、以赛促提升中进一步提高了救护技能，希望保育员在今后的工作中继续实践提升，守护幼儿生命安全防线，呵护孩子们健康成长。 图文编辑 | 花幼新媒体工作室 审 核 | 园长室。
Current article:http://i2sx5s.cuntoujuefourantapai.cfd/k9uauc/20260826/409831.html
Published on:02:53:15
